It’s so boring and overstated. I do use it to write certain things (descriptions for YouTube, summaries of transcripts, Pinterest titles and descriptions) but I use specific prompts and keywords. I don’t really care who gets upset. Then don’t follow me. I don’t care. So tired of the pretentious whiners. Don’t use AI. That’s fine. But don’t tell me I’m wrong or evil for using it.
Like you, I use it as a sounding board and a way to create new tools quickly (not because I couldn't do it myself, because I have done for years, but because it's quicker and time is precious).
I'm also seeing pushback from environmentalists who are unhappy with the huge amounts of water being used for these LLM/AI computers. I haven't verified whether that's true or not, but if it were, that would be the one thing that makes me consider how I use AI.
I think you nailed it with “replacement.”
People are projecting their fears.
And it’s becoming a stale argument.
The people that are doing this are volunteering to be left behind.
Whenever I hear someone complain about AI I figure they either have never used it or don't know how to use it properly.
It’s so boring and overstated. I do use it to write certain things (descriptions for YouTube, summaries of transcripts, Pinterest titles and descriptions) but I use specific prompts and keywords. I don’t really care who gets upset. Then don’t follow me. I don’t care. So tired of the pretentious whiners. Don’t use AI. That’s fine. But don’t tell me I’m wrong or evil for using it.
"AI won't replace you. The person using it will." ~ Tony Robbins
Like you, I use it as a sounding board and a way to create new tools quickly (not because I couldn't do it myself, because I have done for years, but because it's quicker and time is precious).
I'm also seeing pushback from environmentalists who are unhappy with the huge amounts of water being used for these LLM/AI computers. I haven't verified whether that's true or not, but if it were, that would be the one thing that makes me consider how I use AI.